|
''Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd'' (2006) (C-131/04 ) is a European labour law and UK labour law case concerning the Working Time Directive, which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998. ==Facts== Employers would give people ‘rolled up’ holiday pay, by adding a so-called ‘premium’ to wages if holidays were not taken. In three cases a Tribunal and the Court of Appeal referred to the European Court of Justice the question whether this was permissible under the Working Time Directive article 7, which states that annual leave must be taken, and only if the employment relationship terminates may there be a pay in lieu. ===''Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd''=== Mr Robinson-Steele worked as a redevelopment agent from April 2002 to December 2003, 5 days a week, or 4 nights a week, in 12 hour shifts, with a one-week break over Christmas 2002. His first ‘temporary worker’ contract stated entitlement to leave was rolled into his ordinary pay at 8.33% of his hourly rate of £6.25 in the day and £7.75 at night per hour. The Leeds Employment Tribunal held there was a conflict between an Employment Appeal Tribunal decision and the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session, in ''MPS Structure Ltd v Munro''〔() ICR 430, () IRLR 350〕 over whether such ‘rolled up holiday pay’ was lawful. It made a reference to the ECJ. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|